Q. in the story behind the movie "Interstellar" does Cooper's son Tom ever learn about his father surviving just like Murph eventually did?
A. In the movie "Interstellar," there isn't a clear indication whether Cooper's son, Tom, ever learns about his father surviving. The focus is primarily on Murphy's journey and her eventual realization that her father is alive. Tom's storyline takes a different path, with the film showing his struggles on Earth and his attempts to keep the family farm running amidst worsening conditions.
While it would be nice to think that Tom eventually learned about his father's survival, the film does not explicitly address this. The narrative centers more on Cooper's relationship with Murph and the emotional resolution between them.
Q. In what U.S. state is Cooper's farm supposed to be in?
A. Cooper's farm in "Interstellar" is located in the U.S. state of Colorado. The filmmakers chose this location to depict the harsh environmental conditions and the struggle for survival that the characters face, which is central to the movie's plot.
The coordinates that Cooper and Murphy travel to in the truck... is that Cheyenne Mountain?
Yes, the coordinates that Cooper and Murphy travel to in the truck in "Interstellar" lead them to a secret NASA facility located within the Cheyenne Mountain Complex in Colorado. This location is depicted as a hidden base where NASA is working on the Endurance mission to find a new habitable planet for humanity.
Q. I feel a bit skeptical that NASA would launch from within Cheyenne Mountain. How would they have carved out a launch window in a mountain of granite?
A. Your skepticism is entirely understandable. In reality, launching a spacecraft from within a granite mountain like Cheyenne Mountain would indeed pose significant technical challenges. The movie "Interstellar" takes some creative liberties for the sake of storytelling.
In practice, NASA and other space agencies typically launch spacecraft from open, flat areas to provide a clear trajectory and minimize risks. Mountains are not practical launch sites due to the need for a large, clear area and the challenges of creating an unobstructed flight path.
The choice of Cheyenne Mountain in the movie likely serves a more symbolic and dramatic purpose, emphasizing the secretive and desperate nature of the mission. It's one of those moments where Hollywood bends reality a bit to serve the narrative.
Q. how is Murph's watch still working after 25 years on the bookshelf?
A. That's a great question! In "Interstellar," Murph's watch symbolizes the connection between her and her father, Cooper. The fact that the watch is still working after 25 years on the bookshelf is more of a plot device and dramatic element than a strictly realistic detail.
In reality, a mechanical watch could potentially continue to function if it were well-made and stored under ideal conditions. Quartz watches, which are powered by batteries, might not last that long without a battery replacement. But "Interstellar" is a science fiction film, so it takes some creative liberties for the sake of the story and emotional impact.
The watch represents Cooper's message to Murph through the Morse code, and its significance in the narrative outweighs the need for absolute realism. It's one of those moments where the storytelling takes precedence over technical accuracy.
Q. Is the hibernation sleep anywhere near a reality as portrayed in the time frame represented in the movie itself?
A. The concept of hibernation sleep for humans, as portrayed in "Interstellar," is still in the realm of science fiction. However, there is ongoing research into the possibility of inducing a hibernation-like state in humans, particularly for long-duration space travel.
Researchers are exploring the potential benefits and mechanisms of hibernation-like sleep, drawing inspiration from animals that naturally hibernate. For example, studies have shown that certain proteins and metabolic processes in hibernating animals could be key to understanding how to induce a similar state in humans2. While we are not yet at the point where we can safely and effectively put humans into hibernation, the research is promising and could lead to significant advancements in the future.
Q. In what year does the movie take place in at the beginning?
A. "Interstellar" begins in a near-future setting, around the year 2067. This time frame is inferred from various clues in the film, such as the technological advancements and the environmental conditions depicted. The exact year isn't explicitly stated, but it's clear that the events take place a few decades from our present time.
Q. Wouldn't it have been logical to place a satellite or satellites around the worm hole? Since it is a sphere, wouldn't telemetry come out of it in all directions instead of the one implied in the movie?
A. Your point is quite insightful! In reality, placing satellites around a wormhole would be a logical approach to gather comprehensive data and telemetry from all directions. Given that a wormhole is a three-dimensional structure, monitoring it with multiple satellites positioned at various angles would provide a more complete understanding of its behavior and properties.
In "Interstellar," the depiction of telemetry and communication with the wormhole might have been simplified for storytelling purposes. The complexities of real-world space exploration and the practical challenges of deploying and maintaining satellites around a wormhole might not have been fully explored in the movie.
The movie focuses more on the dramatic and emotional aspects of the story, sometimes at the expense of scientific accuracy. However, your suggestion aligns well with how scientists might approach studying such a phenomenon in real life.
Q. Why couldn't the 5th dimensional beings simply pass information through the wormhole to scientists on earth?
A. In "Interstellar," the 5th-dimensional beings, referred to as "They," have a complex relationship with the dimensions and means of communication. The movie implies that these beings exist in higher dimensions, which means their perception of time and space is vastly different from ours. Their ability to interact with lower dimensions is limited by our understanding and perception of those dimensions.
Instead of passing information directly through the wormhole, "They" created a tesseract—a 4th-dimensional structure—inside the black hole for Cooper to communicate with Murph using Morse code through gravitational anomalies. This method of communication was chosen to ensure that Murph received the information in a form she could understand and act upon.
From a storytelling perspective, this approach adds emotional weight and a sense of connection between Cooper and Murph. It emphasizes the importance of human intuition, perseverance, and love in overcoming seemingly insurmountable challenges.
Q. Couldn't the 5th-dimensional beings use radio waves to communicate through the wormhole since a ping is just that?
A. That's a fascinating thought! From a practical perspective, using radio waves to communicate through the wormhole might indeed be a plausible approach. Radio waves are a form of electromagnetic radiation that can travel through the vacuum of space, making them suitable for long-distance communication.
In "Interstellar," the decision to use gravitational anomalies and the tesseract as the medium for communication likely served a more thematic and symbolic purpose. The filmmakers wanted to emphasize the idea that love and human connection transcend dimensions and time. By using a more complex and emotionally charged method of communication, the story highlights the bond between Cooper and Murph, adding depth to their relationship.
While radio waves could have been a logical choice, the filmmakers chose to explore a more imaginative and poetic solution that aligns with the film's themes. It's a great example of how science fiction often blends scientific concepts with creative storytelling to evoke a deeper emotional response.
Q. If the wormhole is a sphere, isn't a black hole also a sphere theoretically?
A. Yes, theoretically, a black hole is also a sphere. In general relativity, black holes are described as having a spherical event horizon—the boundary beyond which nothing can escape. The event horizon is symmetric in all directions, forming a three-dimensional spherical shape.
However, it's important to note that black holes can exhibit more complex structures. For example, rotating black holes, known as Kerr black holes, have an event horizon that is still generally spherical, but they also possess an oblate shape due to the effects of rotation. This means that the black hole's equatorial radius is slightly larger than its polar radius, making it more like an ellipsoid than a perfect sphere.
In essence, while black holes are often modeled as spheres for simplicity, their actual shape can vary depending on factors like rotation and the presence of nearby matter.
Q. So if I understand you correctly, theoretically the rotation aspect of a black hole can be at any angle and not just horizontal and vertical as portrayed in the move?
A. Yes, you understand correctly. The rotation axis of a black hole can indeed be oriented at any angle. In the movie, the portrayal of the black hole's rotation may seem simplified for visual clarity and storytelling purposes.
In reality, black holes can rotate at various angles, just like planets and stars. The angle of rotation is determined by the black hole's formation and the angular momentum it acquires from the matter that collapses to form it. This means the rotation axis could be tilted in any direction relative to an observer.
The key concept here is that the rotation of a black hole isn't confined to specific planes like horizontal or vertical. It can have any orientation, depending on the circumstances of its formation and interactions with surrounding matter.
Q. Theoretically, what would it take to keep a wormhole open?
A. Theoretically, keeping a wormhole open would require a form of exotic matter with negative energy density. This exotic matter is necessary to counteract the natural tendency of the wormhole to collapse under its own gravitational pull. Here are some key points about the concept:
Exotic Matter: This hypothetical substance has properties that are not found in conventional matter. It would possess negative energy density, which creates a repulsive gravitational effect. This repulsion could counteract the gravitational forces that would otherwise cause the wormhole to collapse.
Stability: For a wormhole to remain traversable, it must be stable and prevent the formation of event horizons (surfaces from which nothing can escape). The exotic matter would need to be distributed in such a way that it supports the wormhole's structure and keeps it open.
Theoretical Framework: The concept of wormholes and the need for exotic matter is based on solutions to the equations of general relativity, particularly the work of physicists like Kip Thorne. These solutions suggest that, in theory, wormholes could exist, but their stability is highly dependent on exotic matter.
Practical Challenges: Currently, there is no experimental evidence for the existence of exotic matter, and its creation and manipulation would pose significant technological challenges. Additionally, the energy requirements to keep a wormhole open would likely be enormous.
While the idea of traversable wormholes is an exciting possibility in theoretical physics, it's important to note that we are far from achieving this in practice. The concepts remain largely speculative and part of the fascinating world of science fiction.
Q. Perhaps the phrase would be more descriptive as hypothetical physics instead of theoretical physics as it cannot be tested.
A. That's an interesting point! The distinction between "theoretical physics" and "hypothetical physics" can be quite nuanced.
Theoretical physics refers to the use of mathematical models and abstractions to explain and predict natural phenomena. It often deals with concepts that are well-established within the scientific community and can sometimes be tested through experiments or observations, even if the technology to do so isn't currently available.
Hypothetical physics, on the other hand, might refer to ideas and concepts that are more speculative and not yet grounded in established theories. These ideas could be more difficult or even impossible to test with our current understanding and technology.
In the context of wormholes and exotic matter, you could argue that these concepts straddle the line between theoretical and hypothetical physics. They are grounded in the equations of general relativity, making them part of theoretical physics, but the lack of experimental evidence and the extreme challenges involved in testing these ideas also give them a hypothetical quality.
Q. As they travel through the wormhole, Brandt makes contact with what they call "they" or "them." Doesn't this and other points in the movie indicate that time may be linear and having happened both already and not yet?
A. In "Interstellar," the concepts of time and dimensions are portrayed in a way that challenges our conventional understanding of linear time. The movie suggests that time may be experienced differently by the 5th-dimensional beings (referred to as "they" or "them") and that they have a non-linear perception of time. This idea is reinforced by several key points in the movie:
Tesseract and Murph's Room: Inside the tesseract, Cooper experiences time as a physical dimension. He can see multiple instances of Murph's room at different points in time simultaneously. This suggests that for the 5th-dimensional beings, time is not a linear sequence but rather a landscape they can navigate.
Communication with Murph: The 5th-dimensional beings enable Cooper to communicate with Murph across time by manipulating gravitational waves. This implies that they can interact with different moments in time as easily as we move through space.
Existence of the Wormhole: The wormhole itself is a product of these higher-dimensional beings, indicating their ability to influence events across different times and spaces. Their actions in placing the wormhole and guiding Cooper and Brandt suggest a broader understanding of time as a tapestry where past, present, and future are interconnected.
The movie's portrayal of time aligns with some theoretical physics concepts, such as the idea that higher-dimensional beings might perceive time differently from humans. In this context, time is not strictly linear but rather a more fluid and interconnected entity.
Q. Does Brandt actually feel the physical touch from "them"
A. In "Interstellar," Brandt doesn't explicitly feel a physical touch from "them" (the 5th-dimensional beings). The interactions between the human characters and the higher-dimensional beings are more subtle and abstract. The movie focuses on how "they" influence events and provide assistance through gravitational anomalies and other means, rather than direct physical contact.
The scene you're referring to might be when Cooper is inside the tesseract and perceives "their" influence while communicating with Murph. It's a moment of profound connection and understanding, but not necessarily a physical touch.
The film leaves some aspects open to interpretation, allowing viewers to draw their own conclusions about the nature of the 5th-dimensional beings and their interactions with humans.
Q. Why wouldn't the 5th-dimensional beings build the wormhole to exist at the most habitable planet in that galaxy?
A. That's an intriguing question! In "Interstellar," the 5th-dimensional beings (referred to as "they" or "them") placed the wormhole near Saturn to enable humanity to reach a distant galaxy with potentially habitable planets. While it might seem logical to place the wormhole directly at the most habitable planet, there could be several reasons why this wasn't the case:
Strategic Placement: Placing the wormhole near Saturn provided a point of entry to multiple potential planets. This allowed the explorers to investigate several options rather than committing to just one, increasing the chances of finding a suitable new home for humanity.
Navigational Considerations: Creating a wormhole directly at a habitable planet might pose risks or complications. By placing it at a safer distance, the explorers could better navigate and evaluate their options once they reached the other side.
Storytelling and Exploration: From a narrative perspective, having the explorers journey through the wormhole and then explore multiple planets added to the film's sense of adventure and discovery. It also allowed the characters to face various challenges and make critical decisions along the way.
Technological and Dimensional Constraints: The 5th-dimensional beings might have limitations or specific reasons tied to their higher-dimensional understanding that dictated the wormhole's placement. Their actions are influenced by their non-linear perception of time and space, which may not align with human logic.
Ultimately, the movie uses these elements to create a compelling story while also leaving room for interpretation and discussion.
Q. Why wouldn't the astronauts on the Endurance, after coming out of the wormhole, be able to communicate via radio waves with the other Lazarus mission travelers?
A. In "Interstellar," the astronauts on the Endurance face several challenges that could impede their ability to communicate via radio waves with the other Lazarus mission travelers after coming out of the wormhole:
Distance and Signal Strength: The distances between the planets in the new galaxy and the locations of the other Lazarus missions are vast. Radio signals weaken significantly over long distances, making it difficult to maintain clear communication.
Interference and Obstacles: The environment in and around the wormhole and new planets could introduce interference that disrupts radio waves. Cosmic radiation, magnetic fields, and other celestial phenomena might affect the transmission and reception of signals.
Time Dilation Effects: The intense gravitational fields near the wormhole and the black hole, Gargantua, cause significant time dilation effects. Time moves differently for the astronauts compared to those in other locations, complicating synchronization and communication.
Equipment Limitations: The technology available to the astronauts may not be advanced enough to overcome these challenges. The Endurance and Lazarus missions might not have been equipped with the necessary communication technology to bridge the vast distances effectively.
Narrative Focus: From a storytelling perspective, the isolation of the characters and the communication challenges they face add to the drama and tension of the movie. It emphasizes their reliance on limited information and their need to make critical decisions with minimal contact with others.
While radio waves could theoretically be used for communication, these factors contribute to the difficulty of maintaining reliable contact.
Q. How can messages come through the wormhole from earth but can't be send from the other galaxy to earth?
A. The asymmetry of communication through the wormhole in "Interstellar" is indeed intriguing. Several factors could contribute to this discrepancy:
Wormhole Dynamics: The wormhole might have specific properties or constraints that allow one-way communication more easily than two-way. These properties could be influenced by the higher-dimensional beings who created the wormhole, tailoring it for certain types of communication.
Gravitational Effects: The gravitational fields near the wormhole and the black hole, Gargantua, could interfere with signal transmission. These intense gravitational forces might make it challenging to send signals back through the wormhole from the other galaxy.
Technological Limitations: The technology available to the Endurance crew and the Lazarus missions might not be advanced enough to overcome the challenges of sending signals through the wormhole back to Earth. In contrast, Earth might have developed more sophisticated communication technology over time.
Narrative Purpose: From a storytelling perspective, the difficulty of two-way communication adds tension and urgency to the plot. It emphasizes the isolation of the characters and their reliance on limited information.
The movie focuses on the drama and emotional impact of the characters' journey, and some scientific details are adjusted for narrative purposes.
Q. How would the scientists on earth even know their messages could get through when the same wasn't evident from the other side?
A. Your curiosity is spot-on! In "Interstellar," this aspect is indeed one of the more speculative and abstract elements of the story. Here's a possible explanation:
The scientists on Earth might have had some initial success in sending messages through the wormhole, receiving confirmation that they had reached the intended destination. This could have involved sending simple probes or signals through the wormhole and detecting their presence on the other side.
However, the nature of the wormhole and the surrounding gravitational effects might have made two-way communication challenging or unreliable. The one-way success could have provided the scientists with enough confidence to proceed with the missions, even if the return communication wasn't as reliable.
Additionally, the presence and influence of the 5th-dimensional beings might have played a role in facilitating certain aspects of communication, though this isn't fully explained in the movie. The filmmakers likely chose to focus more on the dramatic and emotional aspects of the story rather than delving into the technical details.
Q. Would any of the Lazarus missions, the one near Gargantua in particular have enough fuel for a return trip when it is implied the Endurance might have had enough.
A. The movie "Interstellar" suggests that the Lazarus missions were primarily one-way trips. The astronauts were sent to explore potential habitable planets, but there was no guarantee of a return trip. The focus was on collecting data and sending back findings to help inform future missions and humanity's survival.
In the case of the planet near Gargantua (Miller's planet), the extreme time dilation and proximity to the black hole present significant challenges. Given the gravitational forces at play, the energy and fuel required for a return trip would be immense. It's unlikely that the Lazarus missions, especially the one near Gargantua, had enough fuel for a return journey. The Endurance had more advanced technology and resources, but even then, it faced significant challenges in navigating the gravitational forces around Gargantua.
The narrative choice to depict the Lazarus missions as one-way trips emphasizes the high stakes and risks involved in the search for a new habitable world. It also adds to the tension and drama of the story, highlighting the dedication and sacrifice of the astronauts.
Q. I get it that while on Miller's planet, Cooper and Brandt lost approximately 23 yrs 4 months of time elapsed relative to earth time however the rest of the mission up to Cooper's waking in the hospital on the space station wouldn't have made Murph as old as she was portrayed to be. Is there an explanation I am missing?
A. Your observation is valid, and it highlights one of the complexities in the portrayal of time dilation in "Interstellar." Here are a few points to consider:
Travel Time: The journey from Earth to Saturn and then through the wormhole to the new galaxy, as well as the travel time between planets in that galaxy, would have taken additional time. This adds up to the elapsed time experienced by characters on Earth.
Time Spent on Other Planets: While Miller's planet experienced extreme time dilation, other planets like Mann's planet might have different time dilation effects. The time spent traveling to and exploring these planets would contribute to the overall elapsed time.
General Relativity Effects: The movie leverages the principles of general relativity, where time passes differently in strong gravitational fields. Gargantua's immense gravity significantly affects the passage of time for the crew members versus those on Earth.
Narrative Time Gaps: There might be time gaps in the narrative that aren't explicitly shown but are implied. The filmmakers focus on key moments for dramatic purposes, and some intermediate periods may be condensed or skipped.
Overall, the combination of travel time, time dilation on different planets, and narrative time gaps contribute to the aging of Murph and the time elapsed on Earth. It emphasizes the emotional weight of the passage of time and the consequences of the mission.
Q. During the scene on Mann's planet when Dr. Mann has pushed Cooper and they are both on the frozen cloud talking, there is a beating sound in the background. Is there any meaning to that sound like the ticking on Miller's planet?
A. The beating sound you hear during the confrontation between Dr. Mann and Cooper on the frozen cloud in "Interstellar" likely serves as an artistic and thematic device. While it may not have an explicit scientific or narrative explanation like the ticking sound on Miller's planet (which represents the passage of time due to extreme time dilation), it can still hold significant meaning:
Tension and Urgency: The beating sound adds to the tension and urgency of the scene. It mirrors the escalating conflict between the characters and underscores the life-or-death stakes of their struggle.
Heartbeat Metaphor: The sound could metaphorically represent a heartbeat, emphasizing the fragility of human life and the intense emotional stress of the moment. It reminds viewers of the human element amidst the vast and cold expanse of space.
Dramatic Effect: Filmmakers often use sound to heighten the emotional impact of a scene. The beating sound serves as an auditory cue to draw the audience deeper into the characters' experiences and the gravity of the situation.
While the beating sound might not have a direct scientific explanation like the ticking on Miller's planet, it enhances the narrative and emotional depth of the scene. If you have any more thoughts or questions, feel free to share!
Q. When Tars is picked up after the explosion that killed Romilly, the hatch opens and tars gets in however Cooper doesn't have his helmet on.
A. Good catch! This is one of those moments where the movie may have prioritized dramatic storytelling over strict adherence to realistic space protocol.
In the context of "Interstellar," there are a few possible explanations for this scene:
Rapid Response: The urgency of the situation might have led to Cooper quickly removing his helmet to assist TARS or respond to the emergency, though this isn't explicitly shown.
Pressurized Environment: The interior of the Endurance could be a pressurized environment, making it safe for Cooper to be without his helmet momentarily. However, this isn't clearly explained in the scene.
Visual Clarity: From a filmmaking perspective, showing Cooper's face without the helmet allows for better visual storytelling and emotional connection with the audience. It makes the scene more impactful, even if it bends the rules of space safety.
Movies often take creative liberties to enhance the narrative, and "Interstellar" is no exception.
Q. After Dr. Mann's death, how many G's is Cooper pulling to match the 67 revolutions per minute of Endurance?
A. To calculate the G-forces Cooper would experience while matching the 67 revolutions per minute (RPM) of the Endurance, we need to consider the centripetal acceleration formula:
𝑎=𝜔2⋅𝑟
This calculation results in an unrealistically high number of G-forces, which suggests that in real-life physics, such a maneuver would be impossible to survive. However, in the context of the movie, the filmmakers likely prioritized dramatic impact over strict adherence to real-world physics.
Q. When Cooper ejects from his ship after entering the black hole, the tesseract saves him. Does that also imply that he comes out of the black hole other than where he entered it?
A. In "Interstellar," when Cooper ejects from his ship after entering the black hole, he finds himself inside the tesseract, a higher-dimensional structure created by the 5th-dimensional beings. This tesseract allows him to perceive and interact with different moments in time within Murph's room.
The tesseract itself exists within the black hole, and the 5th-dimensional beings later collapse it, allowing Cooper to be "rescued" and transported to the vicinity of Saturn, where the human space station Cooper Station is located.
The implication is that Cooper does come out of the black hole at a different location from where he entered. This is facilitated by the 5th-dimensional beings, who have a non-linear perception of time and space. They are able to manipulate the tesseract and ensure Cooper's safe extraction, allowing him to reunite with humanity.
The movie uses this concept to explore the idea of higher-dimensional beings having the ability to navigate and influence different points in time and space, adding a fascinating layer to the story.
Q. If the 5th-dimensional beings collapse the tesseract, how does Cooper survive the black hole afterward?
A. In "Interstellar," the collapse of the tesseract and Cooper's subsequent survival are facilitated by the 5th-dimensional beings (referred to as "they" or "them"). These beings have a unique understanding of and control over higher dimensions, allowing them to manipulate time and space in ways that humans cannot fully comprehend.
When the tesseract collapses, it doesn't necessarily mean that Cooper is left unprotected or subject to the black hole's extreme gravitational forces. Instead, the 5th-dimensional beings ensure his safe extraction from the tesseract and the black hole. They likely use their advanced capabilities to transport Cooper to a safer location, such as near Saturn, where Cooper Station is located.
The exact mechanism of how they achieve this is not explicitly detailed in the film, but it's implied that their mastery over higher dimensions and their intention to help humanity play a crucial role in Cooper's survival. This concept aligns with the film's themes of love, hope, and the interconnectedness of humanity and higher-dimensional beings.
Q. It seems contradictory that the 5th-dimensional beings transport Cooper to a safer location in our galaxy's solar system yet cannot send communication to it.
A. Your observation highlights one of the intriguing aspects of "Interstellar." The 5th-dimensional beings' actions and abilities are portrayed in a way that serves the narrative and themes of the film. While it might seem contradictory, here's a possible explanation:
The 5th-dimensional beings have a non-linear perception of time and space, allowing them to navigate and manipulate these dimensions in ways that humans cannot fully comprehend. Their decision to create the tesseract and enable Cooper to communicate with Murph through gravitational anomalies is a deliberate choice that aligns with the film's themes of love, connection, and human perseverance.
Their ability to transport Cooper to a safer location near Saturn could be seen as an extension of their higher-dimensional capabilities. They intervene at critical moments to ensure humanity's survival and progress. However, their methods of communication and intervention are not always direct or straightforward, reflecting the complexity of their existence and understanding.
The movie focuses on the emotional and thematic aspects of the story, sometimes at the expense of strict logical consistency. The 5th-dimensional beings' actions are portrayed in a way that emphasizes the importance of human connections and the idea that love can transcend dimensions and time.
Q. When Cooper leaves earth to find Brandt, he is in a small vehicle like the Ranger. How does he plan to make the trip to Edmund's planet?
A. When Cooper leaves Earth to find Brandt at the end of "Interstellar," he is indeed in a small vehicle similar to the Ranger. The exact details of his plan to reach Edmund's planet are not fully explained in the movie, but there are a few possibilities to consider:
Docking with a Larger Vessel: Cooper might plan to dock with a larger spacecraft or station that has the necessary resources and fuel for interstellar travel. This could include the remnants of the Endurance or another vessel stationed nearby.
Refueling and Resupply: It's possible that Cooper's vehicle has the capability to refuel and resupply from stations or resources located in space. He might stop at key points along the way to gather the necessary supplies for the journey.
Assistance from Cooper Station: Cooper Station, the space station named after his daughter Murph, likely has advanced technology and resources. Cooper might receive assistance from the station to complete his journey, such as additional fuel, navigation support, and other equipment.
Advanced Technology: The film implies that humanity has made significant technological advancements by the time Cooper embarks on his mission to find Brandt. These advancements could include more efficient propulsion systems and long-range travel capabilities.
Ultimately, the specifics of Cooper's journey to Edmund's planet are left to the viewer's imagination. The focus is more on the emotional and thematic elements of Cooper's determination to reunite with Brandt and continue the mission to find a new habitable world for humanity.
Q. Wouldn't there still be a time shift traveling to get to Edmund's planet so that Brandt would be much older?
A. You're absolutely right—traveling to Edmund's planet would involve significant time dilation and other relativistic effects. Given the vast distances involved, the time experienced by Cooper during the journey would differ from the time experienced by Brandt on the planet.
However, there are a few factors to consider that might mitigate the age difference:
Relative Motion: If Cooper travels at a high velocity, close to the speed of light, time dilation would cause him to age more slowly compared to Brandt, who is on the planet. This effect is a consequence of Einstein's theory of relativity.
Gravitational Effects: The gravitational field of Edmund's planet might also influence the passage of time. Depending on the planet's mass and gravity, time could pass at a different rate compared to the space Cooper is traveling through.
Advanced Technology: The technological advancements depicted in the movie might include more efficient propulsion systems, enabling faster travel and potentially reducing the time difference between Cooper and Brandt.
Narrative Focus: The filmmakers might have chosen to focus on the emotional and thematic reunion of Cooper and Brandt, rather than delving into the complexities of relativistic time differences. This allows the story to emphasize their connection and the ongoing mission to find a habitable world.
While the movie doesn't provide detailed explanations for these factors, it's an interesting aspect to ponder. If you have any more thoughts or questions, feel free to share!
Q. Exactly what process is implied to transfer the quantum data into the second hand of the watch?
A. In "Interstellar," the process of transferring the quantum data into the second hand of the watch is depicted as a combination of advanced understanding of higher dimensions and the manipulation of gravitational waves.
Here’s an outline of the implied process:
Inside the Tesseract: Cooper finds himself inside the tesseract, a higher-dimensional structure created by the 5th-dimensional beings. Within this tesseract, he perceives different moments in Murph's room simultaneously.
Quantum Data: Cooper receives crucial quantum data from TARS, the robot who has transmitted the information from inside the black hole, Gargantua. This data is essential for solving the gravitational equation needed to save humanity.
Gravitational Waves: Cooper uses the gravitational waves within the tesseract to communicate the quantum data. Gravitational waves can influence objects in the 3-dimensional world, and Cooper leverages this property to manipulate the second hand of the watch.
Morse Code: Cooper encodes the quantum data into Morse code, using the movements of the second hand of the watch to convey the information to Murph. By creating precise, deliberate movements, he ensures that the data is accurately transmitted.
Murph’s Discovery: Murph deciphers the Morse code, recognizing that it contains the quantum data needed to complete the equation. This realization allows her to bridge the gap between theoretical physics and practical application, ultimately saving humanity.
The process emphasizes the film’s themes of love and connection, showing how Cooper’s bond with Murph transcends time and dimensions to provide the key to humanity’s survival.
Q. So is it implied that Edmund's planet was earth-like?
A. Yes, it is implied that Edmund's planet has Earth-like conditions and is potentially habitable. Throughout the movie, the focus is on finding a planet that can support human life, and Edmund's planet is presented as a viable option. Here are a few points that suggest this:
Data from Dr. Edmunds: The data sent back by Dr. Edmunds indicates that the planet has a breathable atmosphere and suitable conditions for life. This makes it one of the prime candidates for colonization.
Brandt's Efforts: When Cooper leaves to find Brandt, she is seen setting up a camp on Edmund's planet. This implies that she believes the planet is suitable for sustaining human life and is continuing the mission to establish a new home for humanity.
Visual Cues: The brief glimpses we get of Edmund's planet show a rocky and mountainous landscape, which suggests a terrain that could potentially support human habitation, similar to Earth.
Narrative Conclusion: The film's ending leaves the audience with a sense of hope and possibility, indicating that humanity has a future on Edmund's planet. This aligns with the movie's themes of exploration, survival, and the human spirit's resilience.
While the movie doesn't provide extensive details about the specific conditions on Edmund's planet, the overall implication is that it is a promising candidate for a new home for humanity.
- MoonJoey
Comments